Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Freeman’s Journal - Thursday, April 4, 1895
The Freeman’s Journal - Thursday, April 4, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Bristol Mercury - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Bristol Mercury - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Difference
London, Wednesday.
The Marquis of Queensbery surrendered to his bail to-day at the Central Criminal Court, indicted for publishing a defamatory libel on
Oscar Wilde, by addressing to him a postcard at the Albemarle Club. There was a crowded attendance of the public. On taking his place in the dock, Lord
Queensbery answered the indictment by pleading, first, not guilty; and, secondly, that the libel was true, and was published for the public benefit.
Sir E Clarke, in opening for the prosecution, said very grave issues had been raised because the defendant in the pleadings alleged
that the plaintiff had for some time solicited persons named to commit indecent offences. Certain letters addressed by plaintiff to Lord A Douglas were
brought to him by a man who said he was in distress, and Mr Wilde gave him £15 or £20 to pay his passage to America. Another letter came to plaintiff
through Mr Tree, the actor. It was handed to that gentleman, who in turn gave it to plaintiff. It was couched in extravagant terms, but did not bear the
suggestion made in this case. Coming to Lord Queensbery's action, the learned counsel said the jury might have doubts as to whether the defendant was
responsible for his actions.
Sir E. Clarke, in opening for the prosecution, said very grave issues had been raised, because the defendant in the pleadings alleged that
plaintiff had for some time solicited persons named to commit indecent offences. Certain letters addressed by the plaintiff to Lord A. Douglas were
brought to him by a man who said he was in distress, and Mr Wilde gave him £15 or £20 to pay his passage to America. Another letter came to the plaintiff
through Mr Tree, the actor. It was handed to that gentlemen who in turn gave it to the plaintiff. It was couched in extravagant germs, but it did not bear
the suggestion made in this case. Coming to Lord Queenberry's action the learned counsel said the jury might have doubts whether the defendant was
responsible for his actions.
The plaintiff was examined by Sir Edward Clarke at length on the subject of the letters, which he said he did not regard as important.
He described a stormy interview in his own house with Lord Queensberry, who accused him of a nameless offence. He told the defendant he did not know what
the Queensberry rules were, but the Oscar Wilde rule was to shoot at sight. In ordering the defendant out of the house he described him as the most
infamous brute in London. There was no foundation for the suggestions in the pleadings. Mr Carson cross-examined as to the teaching in "Dorian Gray" and
"phrases and philosophies." Plaintiff replied that he looked at these matters from the point of view of art. The "priest and acolyte" was twaddle, but he
had not dissociated himself from "Cameleon," in which it appeared the man Wood was an unemployed clerk. The plaintiff said, in further cross-examination,
that he not only gave him £15 for his passage to America, but £5 more on the occasion of a champagne lunch before his departure. He denied misconducting
himself with Wood. Lord Douglas had asked him to befriend the man when introducing him. Wood and the plaintiff knew each other by their Christian
names.
After some further evidence, the court adjourned.