Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Freeman’s Journal - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The Freeman’s Journal - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Dublin Evening Telegraph - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Dublin Evening Telegraph - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Difference
London, Thursday Morning.
[...]I hear that Lord Queensberry has been in communication with the Treasury with a view to recovering some of the large expenditure
in which he was involved in connection with the Wilde case. Lord Queensberry claims that Taylor was convicted on evidence procured at his personal expense
his outlay on the transaction being close on £2,000. He is by no means a wealthy man, and as he believes he has no chance of recovering his costs against
Wilde, which would recoup him to some extent, he has made a claim on the Treasury in connection with the matter. It is very likely that the subject will
some up in Parliament when the present case is terminated, as I believe that the Treasury offered Lord Queensberry only £35 at first, though they
subsequently increased it £100, which, of course, is ridiculously disproportionate to his outlay.[...]
London, Thursday Morning. […] I hear that Lord Queensberry has been in communication with the Treasury with a view to recovering some of
the large expenditure in which he was involved in connection with the Wilde case. Lord Queensberry claims that Taylor was convicted on evidence procured
at his personal expense, his outlay on the transaction being close on £2,000. He is by no means a wealthy man, and as he believes he has no chance of
recovering his costs against Wilde, which would recoup him to some extent, he has made a claim on the Treasury in connection with the matter. It is very
likely that the subject will come up in Parliament when the present case is terminated, as I believe that the Treasury offered Lord Queensberry only £35
at first, though they subsequently increased it £100, which, of course, is ridiculously disproportionate to his outlay. […]