Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Weekly Irish Times - Saturday, June 1, 1895
Weekly Irish Times - Saturday, June 1, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Star - Tuesday, May 28, 1895
The Star - Tuesday, May 28, 1895
Difference
The final stage in the trial of Oscar Wilde was entered upon on Saturday at the Old Bailey, London. The Solicitor-General (Sir F.
Lockwood), Mr C. F. Gill, and Mr H. Avory appeared on behalf of the Public Prosecutor; and Sir E. Clarke, Mr C Mathews, and Mr Travers Humphreys
defended.
The final stage in the trial of Oscar Wilde was entered upon on Saturday at the Old Bailey. The Solicitor-General (Sir F. Lock- wood),
Mr. C. F. Gill, and Mr. H. Avorv appeared on behalf of the Public Prosecutor,and Sir E. Clarke, Mr. C. Mathews, and Mr. Travers Humphreys defended. The
court was again crowded, and great interest was taken in the proceedings.
The Solicitor-General resumed his reply on the whole case.
The Judge, in summing up, referred to the difficulties and responsibilities imposed upon everyone connected with a case such as that
before the court. He could not bring himself to give simply a colourless summing up, which was of no good to anybody; but expressed the hope that in
respect of any persons which might be [...] at or conveyed [...] not as opinions to [...] to use whether [...] was the province of the jury themselves to
decide, and it had been the aim of his judicial life, so far as he could, to preserve that province sacred. In concluding, he assured the jury that he had
done his best to point out such things as he thought ought fairly to be said on behalf of the defendant, as well as what might be fairly relied upon on
the other side; and he thanked the jury for their patient and impartial attention to the details of a disagreeable and anxious case.
The jury retired at 3.30.
At 5.25 the jury, who had previously sent a communication to the judge, returned into court. The foreman said they wished to hear the
evidence of the waiter at 10 St. James’s street read over. The judge complied, and said there was not evidence that Parker slept at that house.
The jury then again retired, but after an absence of a few minutes returned with a verdict of "Guilty" upon all the counts in the
indictment.
Taylor was then placed in the dock beside Wilde.
Sir Edward Clarke appealed for the postponement of sentence until next sessions on the ground that a demurrer that the indictment was
bad had not been argued.
His lordship said the passing of sentence would not interfere with the argument, and he thought it right to complete the case at once.
Addressing the defendants, he said that the jury had arrived at a correct verdict, and he could not entertain a shadow of a doubt. He hoped those who
sometimes imagined that a judge was half-hearted in the cause of morality, because he took care that prejudice was not allowed to enter into the case,
would see that that was consistent with a stern sense of indignation at the crime which had been brought home to both of them. In such circumstances he
should pass the severest sentence which the law allowed him, and which was totally inadequate to such a case as this. Wilde and Taylor would each be
imprisoned and kept to hard labour for two years.
Taylor, on hearing the sentence, hurried from the dock, but Wilde, who seemed quite dazed, stood with fixed gaze and trembling hands,
and looking as if about to faint. Two warders were quickly at his side, but Wilde held up his hands as if to keep them off, and addressed the court in a
few unintelligible words. He was then hurried below.
On Saturday evening, immediately following the passing of the sentence, the prisoners were removed to the cells in Newgate Prison
adjoining the Central Criminal Court pending the preparations of the legal warrants authorising their detention for two years. Both were suffering from
nervousness, and betrayed their mental anxiety. From the first they were seperated, but travelled in the same prison van to Pentonville Prison, where they
will serve the preliminary portion of the sentence, a period to be eventually decided by the officials of the gaol. When handed over to the Governor of
Pentonville the prisoners were taken separately to the reception ward.