Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Belfast News-Letter - Friday, April 5, 1895
Belfast News-Letter - Friday, April 5, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Bristol Mercury - Friday, April 5, 1895
Bristol Mercury - Friday, April 5, 1895
Difference
In the Wilde-Queensberry libel case yesterday Mr. Carson had not concluded his address to the jury when the Court adjourned. Counsel
said the Marquis of Queensberry withdrew nothing, and what he had done was premeditatively done. Taylor was the pivot of the whole case, and was absent.
The various men mentioned in the case would be called on the defendant's behalf, and would prove for what purpose they were introduced by Taylor to Wilde.
The man Wood, whom plaintiff had given money to go to America, and who was supposed to be out of the way, would be produced, and give evidence. Mr. Carson
alleged that Mr. Wilde had conceived a passion for Lord Alfred Douglas, who had be come so dominated by Wilde that he had even threatened to shoot his own
father ; and Lord Queensberry was, he contended, bound to have acted as he had done in the interests of his son.
Mr Carson addressed the jury for the defense and had not concluded when the curt adjourned. Counsel said the Marquis of Queensberry
withdrew nothing, and what he had done was premeditatively done. Taylor was the pivot of the whole case, and was absent. Various men mentioned in the case
would be called on defendant's behalf, and would prove what purpose they were introduced by Taylor to Wilde. The man Wood, whom plaintiff had given money
to go to America, and who was supposed to be out of the way, would be produced and give evidence. Mr Carson alleged that Wilde had conceived a vile,
abominable passion for Lord Alfred Douglas, who had become so dominated by Wilde that he even threatened to shoot his own father, and Lord Queensberry
was, he contended, bound to have acted as he had done in the interests of his son.