Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Daily Telegraph - Tuesday, May 28, 1895
The Daily Telegraph - Tuesday, May 28, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Otago Daily Times - Monday, May 27, 1895
The Otago Daily Times - Monday, May 27, 1895
Difference
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural
in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable. In his evidence Wilde denied in
toto all the charges made against him.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that
there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a
perfectly honourable nature.
Wilde after being sentenced appeared quite dazed and horror-stricken. In his despair he weakly muttered a request to be permitted to
address the Court, but this was unheeded, and the warders hurried him off to his cell. During the trial Wilde, who appeared to be suffering from weakness,
was allowed to remain seated in the witness box while giving evidence on his own behalf. He said he always understood Taylor to be a respectable man, and,
referring to his association with him, said the reason for the friendship was because he personally liked praise, and lionising was delightful to him. Sir
Edward Clarke, Q C, counsel for the accused, declared that the witnesses for the prosecution were blackmailers, and that it was impossible to believe
them. The jury asked whether it was intended to arrest Lord Alfred Douglas. The Judge replied that he was not aware of the intention of the police, but in
any case it did not affect the present trial. The jury thought that if Wilde's letters showed him to be guilty, the guilt applied equally to Lord Alfred
Douglas. His Honor concurred in this opinion, but added that the suspicion of the jury that the son of the Marquis of Queensberry was being allowed to
escape owing to his connections was both unfounded and impossible.