Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Marlborough Express - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Marlborough Express - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Otago Daily Times - Friday, April 5, 1895
The Otago Daily Times - Friday, April 5, 1895
Difference
London, April 4.
In the course of his evidence, Mr Wilde explained the effusive language of the letters addressed to Lord Alfred Douglas as the natural
expression of an artist attracted by a beautiful personality. The Marquis of Queensberry visited his residence, and threatened Wilde, to which the latter
responded with—"You are the most infamous brute in London!"
Oscar Wilde explained the effusive language of the letters addressed to Lord Douglas as the natural expression of an artist attracted
by a beautiful personality. The Marquis of Queensberry visited his residence and threatened Wilde, to which that gentleman responded, "You are the most
infamous brute in London."
Wilde admitted a close intimacy with a number of young men, but denied anything improper in it. He paid no regard to social inferiority
if friends were amusing. Lord Douglas' letters showed that he threatened to shoot his father if he attempted to thrash him. The Marquis' letter referred
to eminent statesmen, but the reference as political.
Wilde's case is closed.
Mr Carsons, in opening the defence, declared that the plaintiff's proteges were among the most immoral persons in London. Wilde's
intimacies were absolutely irreconcileable with his claims to be an exponent of culture. His literature alone justified the charges against him. In
conclusion, he claimed that defendant's witnesses, amongst whom was Wood, the chief blackmailer, would prove the case to the hilt.