Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Marlborough Express - Monday, April 8, 1895
Marlborough Express - Monday, April 8, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Hong Kong Daily Press - Friday, May 3, 1895
Hong Kong Daily Press - Friday, May 3, 1895
Difference
London, April 5.
The charge of libel against the Marquis of Queensbery was finished to-day, a verdict of not guilty being returned.
The jury considered that the charges made by Queensbery were of public benefit.
Wilde's counsel withdrew from the case. Wilde himself left the court while his counsel was explaining that the plaintiffs literature and
letter justified the plea of the defence that Wilde posed as an immoral person. He explained the reason he withdrew from the case was so as to avoid the
appalling evidence which would be adduced.
The verdict was received with loud cheers.
The verdict of not guilty was received in court with loud cheers.
It is expected that Wilde will be arrested. No warrant has yet been applied for, but counsel for the Marquis of Queensbery has sent the
Public Prosecutor a statement of witnesses and notes on the evidence in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice.
No warrant against Oscar Wilde was applied for, but Mr. Russell, solicitor for the Marquis of Queensberry, sent to the Public
Prosecutor a statement of the witnesses and notes of the evidence with the object of preventing a miscarriage of justice.