Most similar paragraph from
The Lyttelton Times - Monday, May 27, 1895
Difference
[…] Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the evidence adduced, which is identical with that of the former trial remains unshaken. The Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that this friendship was perfectly honourable.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.