Most similar paragraph from
The Otago Witness - Thursday, May 30, 1895
Difference
[…] Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honourable nature.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.