Most similar paragraph from
Fielding Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Difference
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained. In Piccadilly yesterday Lord Douglas called the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer. The latter eventually knocked his son down. A furious struggle resulted, until the police interfered and separated the pair. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas, of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas, of Howick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted—"He was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son." Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
Wilde's trial is now proceeding.
Wilde's trial is now proceeding.
Oscar Wilde is being retried to-day before a fresh jury.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in conjunction with Taylor, Woods, and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.