Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Oamaru Mail - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The Oamaru Mail - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Wairarapa Daily Times - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Wairarapa Daily Times - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Difference
Received May 23, at 10 a.m.
London, May 22.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending
insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000 and
addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of L500 each to keep the peace.
It is not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Howich, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending an
insulting letter to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight
for ten thousand pounds, and addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of five hundred each, to keep the peace.
Wilde's trial is now proceeding.
Wilde's trial is now proceeding.