Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Thames Advertiser - Friday, May 3, 1895
The Thames Advertiser - Friday, May 3, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The West Australian - Friday, May 3, 1895
The West Australian - Friday, May 3, 1895
Difference
London, May 2.
The summing up of Justice Sir Arthur Charles was in favour of the prisoners Wilde and Taylor, and His Honor emphasised the fact that
several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
Mr. Justice Charles, the presiding Judge, summed up in favour of the prisoners. He emphasized the fact that several of the witnesses for
the prosecution were undoubted black mailers.
The jury disagreed and were discharged. Bail was, however, refused to accused.
The jury disagreed, and were discharged. A new jury will be empannelled.