Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Brooklyn Daily Eagle - Saturday, April 6, 1895
The Brooklyn Daily Eagle - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The San Francisco Call - Sunday, April 7, 1895
The San Francisco Call - Sunday, April 7, 1895
Difference
London, April 6– Oscar Wilde, who passed last night in the Bow street police station after his arrest by officers of the treasury
department, was arraigned in the Bow street court this morning. The courtroom was crowded when Sir John Bridge, the presiding judge, appeared. Lawyer C.
F. Fill, the Marquis of Queensberry’s junior counsel, acted as prosecutor for the treasury department. When the magistrate took his seat the doors leading
to the cells were opened and Wilde was seen approaching with a stately step and carrying a silk hat in his hand. When he reached the center of the
prisoners’ dock he calmly deposited his hat on the seat, bowed to Sir John Bridge, folded his arms and leaned on the rail of the dock in the same insolent
manner which he displayed while on the witness stand on the Old Bailey.
Mr. Gill called as witness to sustain the charge made against Wilde, a young man named Parker, formally a valet. During Parker’s
testimony Wilde moved restlessly in the dock and passed his hand across his face. The man Taylor, whose name has figured prominently is the case, was
arrested and taken into court during Parker’s direct examination. At its conclusion Wilde’s counsel asked leave to postpone cross examination as the
evidence had taken them by surprise.
After several other witnesses had been ex-amined Sir John Bridge remanded Wilde until Thursday next. Counsel asked that his client
Wilde be released on bail but the magistrate declined to do so. Counsel persisted, saying that he could offer substantial bail, but Sir John Bridge
replied:
After a number of witnesses were heard, Sir John Bridges remanded Wilde until next Thursday. Counsel asked that Wilde be released on
bail, but the magistrate denied the request. Counsel persisted, saying he could offer substantial bail, but Sir John Bridges replied: "This is not a case
for bail at all."
"It is not a case for bail at all."