Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Daily Inter Ocean - Friday, May 24, 1895
The Daily Inter Ocean - Friday, May 24, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Chicago Tribune - Friday, May 24, 1895
The Chicago Tribune - Friday, May 24, 1895
Difference
London, May 23. -- The Old Bailey court was again crowded today when the trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed. Wilde entered the courtroom
looking haggard, and stood for some time at the foot of the jury box, conversing with Rev. Stewart Headlam, one of his bondsmen. The two were joined later
on by Lord Douglas of Hawick, whose eye is still discolored as a result of his encounter with his father, the Marquis of Queensberry, in Piccadilly, for
which they were both bound over yesterday in £100 to keep the peace.
London, May 23. - The Old Bailey Court was again crowded today when the trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed. Wilde entered the court room
looking haggard and stood for some time at the foot of the jury box conversing with the Rev. Stewart Headlam, one of his bondsmen. They were joined later
on by Lord Douglas of Hawick, whose eye is still discolored as a result of his encounter with his father, the Marquis of Queensberry. The Marquis was also
in court, looking jaunty and confident. He watched Wilde closely and paid great attention to the evidence. Wilde, it was noticed, carefully avoided the
gaze of the Marquis.
The Marquis of Queensberry was also in court, looking jaunty and confident. He watched Wilde closely and paid great attention to the
evidence. Wilde, it was noticed, carefully avoided the gaze of the Marquis. Wilde, Lord Douglas of Hawick, and Rev. Stewart Headlam remained in earnest
conversation until the Judge took his seat. They listened attentively to all the testimony furnished, evidently weighing every word uttered as studiously
as did the counsel on both sides. The earnest conversation of the trio was an incident that attracted much attention, and was considerably commented
upon.
When the case was reopened the evidence furnished at the previous trial was repeated in detail, no new points of any importance being
made. Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for Wilde, reviewed in full the evidence furnished by his client when the latter was examined upon the occasion of the
trial of the Marquis of Queensberry on the charge of libel. This occupied several hours, at the expiration of which time Sir Edward Clarke addressed the
jury in behalf of Wilde. At the conclusion of the day's proceedings the trial was adjourned until tomorrow.