Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The National Police Gazette - Saturday, April 20, 1895
The National Police Gazette - Saturday, April 20, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Boston Globe - Saturday, April 6, 1895
The Boston Globe - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Difference
London, April 6 — The career of Oscar Wilde ended today in blackest infamy. All London is saying it is a pity the miserable creature
had not sufficient pluck to blow out his brains before the police seized him and put him behind the bars to await the punishment for the crime of which he
is already proved guilty. Those who were his friends until his guilt was established by his own admissions under yesterday’s merciless cross-examination,
urged him last night to take the shortest road to oblivion, which they declared, was the only proper sequel to the exposure of his character.
This poor fool imagined it still possible to brazen it out, so he persuaded his lawyer, who refused to go on with the case, to bring
the trial to close by withdrawing the charges against Lord Queensberry. This was done, and then the fact was speedily brought home to Wilde that although
nominally the prosecutor it was him and not the Marquis of Queensberry who was really on trial. Even the prompt verdict of the jury declaring explicitly
that the infamous crime against him was true did not make the strange creature realize his position. He wrote a note to an evening newspaper declaring
that he was unable to prove his innocence except by putting Lord Alfred Douglas to the witness box, and that he preferred to suffer with his father than
to allow the son to testify against his father. This was simply imbecile, because nothing been adduced in the trial about the relations between Wilde and
Lord Alfred.
There is reason to believe that the disgraced man was prepared to flee from the country. But English law for sure acted with
commendable promptness. [...] The public prosecutor applied for a warrant within two hours after the dramatic collapse of the case in court, and the man
who a few days ago was a pampered exquisite, was on a plunk bed in an eight by four cell in the Bow street police station. The charge against him, for
some reason not explained, is not felony, but misdemeanor, and the maximum penalty is two years at hard labor, but the Grand Jury may change the
indictment to a more serious offence.
It is impossible to describe the sensation which this case has created in London. The Cleveland street scandals of a few years ago
were bad enough, but the public interest then was mild compared to the talk created by this case. It has been the only subject discussed wherever man have
congregated for the last few days. It must be said that public opinion is almost unanimous in thanking the Marquis of Queensberry, for bringing to a
crisis what has long been a rapidly spreading scandal in the metropolis.
It is impossible to describe the sensation which the case has created in London. The Cleveland st scandal of a few years ago was bad
enough, but the public interest then was mild, compared to the talk created by this case. It has been the only subject discussed wherever men have
congregated, for the last few days.