Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The San Francisco Call - Sunday, April 7, 1895
The San Francisco Call - Sunday, April 7, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Chicago Tribune - Sunday, April 7, 1895
The Chicago Tribune - Sunday, April 7, 1895
Difference
LONDON, ENG., April 6. -- Crowds besieged the vicinity of Bow street early this morning and the Police Court was filled with
interested spectators as soon as the doors opened.
All were anxious to see Oscar Wilde, whose arrest yesterday followed close upon the sensational termination of his suit for libel
against the Marquis of Queensberry.
C. F. Gill, who was Edward M. Carson's junior counsel in the defense of the Marquis of Queensberry, acted as prosecutor to-day for the
Treasury Department.
After a number of witnesses were heard, Sir John Bridges remanded Wilde until next Thursday. Counsel asked that Wilde be released on
bail, but the magistrate denied the request. Counsel persisted, saying he could offer substantial bail, but Sir John Bridges replied: "This is not a case
for bail at all."
Sir John Bridge remanded Wilde until Thursday. Counsel asked that his client, Wilde, be released on bail, but the magistrate declined
to do so. Counsel persisted, saying he could offer substantial bail, but Sir John Bridge replied: