Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The San Francisco Call - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
The San Francisco Call - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Philadelphia Inquirer - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
The Philadelphia Inquirer - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
Difference
LONDON, ENG., April 30. -- In Old Bailey to-day Oscar Wilde testified in his own behalf. In poetic language he denied the charges
against him. During his argument for the defense Sir Edward Clarke appealed to the jury not to convict Wilde unless the evidence against him was
overwhelming, and asked the jury to liberate from a terrible position "one of the most renowned, accomplished men of letters."
Sir Edward contended that there was no real evidence against Wilde except that of blackmailers, whose testimony should be utterly
discredited. Counsel then appealed to the jury not to convict his client unless the evidence against him was overwhelming, and asked the jury to liberate
from a terrible position "one of the most renowned and accomplished men of letters."