Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Wichita Daily Eagle - Friday, April 5, 1895
The Wichita Daily Eagle - Friday, April 5, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
St. Paul Daily Globe - Friday, April 5, 1895
St. Paul Daily Globe - Friday, April 5, 1895
Difference
London, April 4. -- There was unabated interest today at the Old Bailey in the taking of testimony on the second day of the suit of
libel brought by Oscar Wilde against the marquis of Queensbury. Oscar upon resuming his jlace on the witness stand, admitted that he had attended tea
parties in the rooms of a man named Taylor, which were artistically furnished and in which perfumes were burning. He denied any improper relations having
been permitted there. Wilde in his answer to questions put to him exhibited confusion and contradicted himself frequently.
Queensbury's attorney, Carson, plied him with questions which were in the main pitiless and unprintable. The cross-examination was
concluded at noon, after having lasted six hours. Sir Edward Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of his client by putting in
evidence certain letters of the marquis in which he called upon his son Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease his "infamous relations" with the plaintiff, saying
that his blood turned cold at the sight of their "infamous faces." He added: "I hear that Wilde's wife will petition for divorce on the ground of
unnatural crime. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us, I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
Mr. Carson's questions were, in the main, pitiless and unprintable. Mr. Carson's cross-examination of the plaintiff was concluded at
noon, after having lasted, including the time of yesterday, over six hours. Sir Edward Clarke, leading counsel for Wilde, then began the examination of
his client by putting in certain letters of the Marquis of Queensberry, in which he called upon his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, to cease his "infamous
intimacy" with the plaintiff, saying that his "blood turned cold at the sigh of their infamous faces." He added: "I hear that Wilde's wife will petition
for a divorce on ground of unnatural crimes. If you do not cease to let him disgrace us, I shall feel justified in shooting him on sight."
To this letter Lord Alfred replied: "What a funny little man you are."
To this letter Lord Alfred Douglas replied by telegraph to his father, saying: "What a funny little man you are."
After the production of other letters the case for the plaintiff was closed. Carson began his speech for the defense. It was terribly
denunciatory of Wilde, who left the court-room.
Most of the newspapers are printing the testomony verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such today that the St. James
Gazette says: The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot repeat it. The English
public is at the present moment involved in one of the worst orgies of indecency permitted by the operation of open law courts and an enterprising
press."
Most of the newspapers are printing the testimony in the suit almost verbatim, but the character of the testimony is such today that
the St. James Gazette says: "The nature of the evidence and the whole circumstances of the case prove to be of such a character that we cannot report it."
The Gazette adds: "The English public is at the present moment involved in one of those