Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Washington Post - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
The Washington Post - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
San Francisco Chronicle - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
San Francisco Chronicle - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
Difference
London, May 21.—The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. The evidence was concluded with Taylor’s
testimony, and counsel began their addresses to the jury, which retired at 3:25 p. m.
When the jury returned to the court room and had been polled, the foreman stated they they could not agree that the prisoner had
procured Charles Parker for Wilde, nor that Wilde had committed acts of indecency with Parker. They, however, found Taylor guilty on two counts in regard
to Charles and William Parker.
When the jury returned to the courtroom and was polled the foreman stated that they could not agree as to whether the prisoner had
procured Charles Parker for Wilde or that Wilde had committed acts of indecency with Parker. They, however, found Taylor guilty on two counts in regard to
Charles and William Parker. Taylor’s sentence was delayed until a verdict shall be reached in the trial of Wilde, which will begin tomorrow before a fresh
jury.
Taylor’s sentence was delayed until a verdict shall be reached in the trial of Wilde, which will began to-morrow.