The Adelaide Observer - Saturday, June 1, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
WILDE AND TAYLOR.
London, May 26.
The hearing of the charges against Oscar Wilde was resumed to-day, when, counsel having concluded their addresses to the Jury, Sir Alfred Wills summed up the evidence in an exhaustive address which took three hours in delivery.
The hearing of the charges against Oscar Wilde was resumed to-day, when, counsel having concluded their addresses to the Jury, Sir Alfred Wills summed up the evidence in an exhaustive address which took three hours in delivery.
The hearing of the charges against Oscar Wilde was resumed to-day, when, counsel having concluded their addresses to the Jury, Sir Alfred Wills summed up the evidence in an exhaustive address which took three hours in delivery.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict and were absent from the Court for two hours, when they brought in a verdict of guilty.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict and were absent from the Court for two hours, when they brought in a verdict of guilty.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict and were absent from the Court for two hours, when they brought in a verdict of guilty.
The jury retired to consider their verdict at half-past three o'clock, and returned a verdict of guilty.
Sir Alfred Wills, in sentencing the prisoner, regretted that he was only able to sentence him to two years' imprisonment, which, in his opinion, was totally inadequate punishment for the offence.
Sir Alfred Wills, in sentencing the prisoner, regretted that he was only able to sentence him to two years' imprisonment, which, in his opinion, was totally inadequate punishment for the offence.
Sir Alfred Wills, in sentencing the prisoner, regretted that he was only able to sentence him to two years' imprisonment, which, in his opinion, was totally inadequate punishment for the offence.
Mr. Justice Wills, in addressing the prisoners, regretted that he was only able to pass a sentence of two years, which in his opinion was totally inadequate for the crime of which they had been convicted.
Mr. Justice Wills, in addressing the prisoners, regretted that he was only able to pass a sentence of two years, which in his opinion was totally inadequate for the crime of which they had been convicted.
Alfred Taylor, who had been previously convicted, was then brought into Court and sentenced to a similar period of imprisonment.
Alfred Taylor, who had been previously convicted, was then brought into Court and sentenced to a similar period of imprisonment.
Alfred Taylor, who had been previously convicted, was then brought into Court and sentenced to a similar period of imprisonment.