The Leader - Saturday, May 25, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
THE WILDE SCANDAL.
LONDON. 20TH MAY.
In the Court of Queen's Bench to-day, before Justice Sir Alfred Wills and a Grand Jury, the case of Oscar Wilde and the man Taylor, alleged to be his confederate, charged with flagrant criminal immorality, was brought up for retrial.
In the Court of Queen's Bench to-day, before Justice Sir Alfred Wills and a Grand Jury, the case of Oscar Wilde and the man Taylor, alleged to be his confederate, charged with flagrant criminal immorality, was brought up for retrial.
The Grand Jury accepted the suggestion of the judge, that the accused should be tried separately, and it was decided that Taylor's case should be tried first.
The Grand Jury accepted the suggestion of the judge, and it was decided that Taylor's case should be tried first.
The evidence given by Parker in the first trial as to the conduct of Wilde, in Taylor's room, remains unshaken.
The evidence given by Parker in the first trial as to the conduct of Wilde, in Taylor's room, remains unshaken.
The evidence of Parker and Woods as to the conduct of Wilde, was taken to-day, and remained unshaken.
LONDON, 21ST MAY.
The hearing of the charge of criminal immorality against the man Taylor, who is associated with Oscar Wilde, terminated this afternoon.
The hearing of the charge of criminal immorality against the man Taylor, who is associated with Oscar Wilde, terminated this afternoon.
The hearing of the charge of criminal immorality against the man Taylor, who is associated with Oscar Wilde, terminated this afternoon. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.
The jury returned a verdict of guilty.
The verdict of the jury in the Wilde-Taylor case says that the prisoner Taylor had been proved by the evidence to have been twice guilty of indecency.
The verdict of the jury in the Wilde-Taylor case says that the prisoner Taylor had been proved by the evidence to have been twice guilty of indecency.
On the charges of procuration, the jury disagreed.
The jury stated that they had not been able to agree on the question whether Taylor and Wilde had committed indecency together.
The jury stated that they had not been able to agree on the question whether Taylor and Wilde had committed indecency together.
The judge deferred sentence.
LONDON, 22ND MAY.
The trial of Wilde is proceeding to-day. The case for the Crown comprises charges of criminal indecency with Taylor, Parkes, Woods and Shelley.
The trial of Wilde is proceeding to-day. The case for the Crown comprises charges of criminal indecency with Taylor, Parkes, Woods and Shelby.
The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the court during the trial.
The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the court during the trial.
The marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in the court in the forenoon.
The marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in the court in the forenoon.
The evidence given against Wilde by the witnesses for the prosecution remains unshaken by cross-examination.
The evidence given against Wilde by the witnesses for the prosecution remains unshaken by cross-examination.
LONDON, 23RD MAY.
The re-trial of the charges against Oscar Wilde is being continued to-day, before Mr. Justice Wills.
The re-trial of the charges against Oscar Wilde is being continued to-day, before Mr. Justice Wills.
The evidence, so far, is identical with that given at the original trial, and the testimony of the witnesses has not been shaken in any essential particular by cross-examination.
The evidence, so far, is identical with that given at the original trial, and the testimony of the witnesses has not been shaken in any essential particular by cross-examination.
Sir Edward Clarke applied that the judge should not send the Savoy Hotel case to the jury.
Mr. Justice Wills said that a sense of duty prevented him withdrawing this count from the consideration of the jury. He, however, determined to dismiss the count of indecency between Wilde and Shelley, on the ground that the evidence lacked support and it had been shown that Shelley suffered from delusions.
Mr. Justice Wills said that a sense of duty prevented him withdrawing this count from the consideration of the jury. He, however, determined to dismiss the count of indecency between Wilde and Shelley, the young man who was employed as an assistant publisher to a well known firm, on the ground that the evidence lacked support, and it had been shown that Shelley suffered from delusions.
His lordship said that there was nothing unnatural in the friendship between Wilde and Shelley, and it had not been proved to be otherwise than perfectly honorable.
His lordship said that there was nothing unnatural in the friendship between Wilde and Shelley, and it had not been proved to be otherwise than perfectly honorable.