The South Australian Register - Friday, May 3, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
ADELAIDE AND LONDON
TELEGRAPH
[BY SUBMARINE TELEGRAPH.]
RECEIVED between 4.45 a.m., May 2,
and
3.20 a.m., May 3.
THE TRIAL OF OSCAR
WILDE.
THE JUDGE'S SUMMING UP.
FAVOURABLE TO THE
PRISONERS.
JURY UNABLE TO AGREE.
BAIL REFUSED.
London, May 1.
The Jury were unable to agree, and have been discharged.
Bail has been refused.
[LATER]
London, May 1.
In the trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor Mr. Justice Charles summed up the evidence against the prisoners to-day. In reviewing the statements for the defence, the Judge dealt with the characters and deportment of the witnesses for the prosecution, and emphatically gave it as his opinion that several of them were undoubtedly "blackmailers," who had sought to extort money from the prisoners under threats of making charges against them to the police.
In the trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor Mr. Justice Charles summed up the evidence against the prisoners to-day. In reviewing the statements for the defence, the Judge dealt with the characters and deportment of the witnesses for the prosecution, and emphatically gave it as his opinion that several of them were undoubtedly "blackmailers," who had sought to extort money from the prisoners under threats of making charges against them to the police.
In the trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor, Mr. Justice Charles summed up the evidence against the prisoners to-day. In reviewing the statements for the defence, the Judge dealt with the characters and deportment of the witnesses for the prosecution, and emphatically gave it as his opinion that several of them were undoubtedly "blackmailers," who had dought to extort money from the prisoners under threats of making charges against them to the police.
The Judge's summing up was clearly in favour of both the prisoners.
The Judge's summing up was clearly in favour of both the prisoners.
The Judge's summing up was clearly in favour of both the prisoners.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict, and after a considerable time returned to Court, stating that they could not agree, and that there was no possible chance of their arriving at a decision.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict, and, after a considerable time, returned to Court, stating that they could not agree, and that there was no possible chance of their arriving at a decision.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict, and after a considerable time returned to Court, stating that they could not agree, and that there was no possible chance of their arriving at a decision.
The Judge accordingly discharged the Jury.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., on behalf of the defendants, applied that they should be released on bail.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., on behalf of the defendants, applied that they should be released on bail.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., on behalf of the defendants, applied that they should be released on bail.
The Judge said he must refuse the application. Prisoners would be detained pending the decision of the Crown as to what further steps should be taken in the case.
The Judge said he must refuse the application. Prisoners would be detained pending the decision of the Crown as to what further steps should be taken in the case.
The Judge said he must refuse the application. Prisoners would be detained pending the decision of the Crown as to what further steps should be taken in the case.
[Portion of the above telegram appeared in the second edition of yesterday's Register.]