Irish Times - Friday, July 26, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
A RECEIVING order was yesterday granted against Oscar Wilde, the petitioning creditor being the Marquis of Queensberry, who claims £677 for costs in the debtor’s unsuccessful libel actions.
A receiving order was made in the Bankruptcy Court to-day against Oscar Wilde, the petitioning creditor being the Marquis of Queensberry, who claims £679 fr costs in the debtor's unsuccessful action for criminal libel.
A receiving order was made in the London Bankruptcy Court to-day against Oscar Wilde, the petitioning creditor being the Marquis of Queensberry, who claims £677 for costs in the debtor’s unsuccessful action for criminal libel.
A receiving order was made in the Bankruptcy Court on Thursday against Oscar Wilde, the petitioning creditor being the Marquis of Queensbury, who claims £679 for costs in the debtors unsuccessful action for criminal libel.
A receiving order was made in the London Bankruptcy Court on Thursday against Oscar Wilde, the petitioning creditor being the Marquis of Queensberry, who claims £677 for coats in the debtor’s unsuccessful action for criminal libel.
A receiving order in bankruptcy was issued against Oscar Wilde's property to-day by the Marquis of Queensberry, claiming £677 costs in the debtor's unsuccessful action for libel.
A receiving order in bankruptcy was issued against Oscar Wilde's property by the Marquis of Queensbury, claiming £677 costs in the debtor's unsuccessful action for libel.
A receiving order in the bankruptcy was issued against Oscar Wilde's property today by the marquis of Queensberry claiming £677 costs in the debtor’s unsuccessful action for libel.
- Evening Herald - Thursday, July 25, 1895 - 76.4%
Compare - Sligo Champion - Saturday, July 27, 1895 - 75.2%
Compare - Kerry Weekly Reporter - Saturday, July 27, 1895 - 74.3%
Compare - The Freeman’s Journal - Friday, July 26, 1895 - 71.9%
Compare - Daily World - Thursday, July 25, 1895 - 63.0%
Compare - The Chicago Tribune - Saturday, July 27, 1895 - 62.0%
Compare - The Chicago Chronicle - Friday, July 26, 1895 - 61.4%
Compare