Marlborough Express - Thursday, May 23, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
FATHER AND SON.
London, May 22.
Sir Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and slanderer.
Sir Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer.
Sir Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slander.
Lord Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer.
Lord Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer.
Lord Alfred began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer.
Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer.
The latter eventually knocked his son down.
A furious struggle resulted, until the police interfered and separated the pair.
A furious struggle resulted, until the police interfered, and at once separated the pair.
A furious struggle resulted, until the police interfered, and at once separated the pair.
The latter eventually knocked his son down; a furious struggle resulted until the police interfered and separated the pair.
The latter eventually knocked his son down, and a furious struggle resulted until the police interfered and separated the pair.
The latter eventually knocked his son down, and a furious struggle resulted until the police interfered and separated the pair.
The Marquis eventually knocked his son down, and a furious struggle resulted until the police interfered and separated the pair.
Later.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Howick, with whom the quarrel occurred.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Howick, with whom the quarrel occurred.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Howick, with whom the quarrel occurred.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred.
The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties.
The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties.
The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties.
Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000 and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son.
The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son.
The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son.
Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for ten thousand pounds.
Both were bound over, in sureties of £500 each, to keep the peace.
Wilde's trial is now proceeding.
- West Coast Times - Saturday, May 25, 1895 - 81.7%
Compare - Wairarapa Daily Times - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 71.6%
Compare - Hawera & Normanby Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 67.6%
Compare - The Oamaru Mail - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 66.5%
Compare - North Otago Times - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 66.3%
Compare - Wanganui Herald - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 64.1%
Compare - The Otago Daily Times - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 64.0%
Compare - The Hawke's Bay Herald - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 63.4%
Compare - The Daily Telegraph - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 62.7%
Compare - The Poverty Bay Herald - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 61.7%
Compare - Fielding Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 60.6%
Compare - The Thames Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 60.6%
Compare