The Clutha Leader - Friday, June 28, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
Local and General.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show that persons accused of the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrate. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labour for the crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show that persons accused of the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrate. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labour for the crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show that persons accused of the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrate. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labour for the crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show that persons accused of the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrate. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labour for the crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Courts show that persons accused of the offense of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrates. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, twenty-eight years old, and said to have a good education, was sentenced to two years' hard labor for the identical crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention the records of the London Police courts show that persons accused of the offense for which he is committed come frequently before the magistrates. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old and said to have a good education, was sentenced to two years at hard labor for the identical crime. The Judge remarked that no country could remain great while such persons were allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show (according to Ballard Smith, the correspondent in this case) that persons accused of the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrates. On the very day Wilde was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labor for this identical crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde’s case has obtained the public attention recently, the London police reports show that the persons accused for the offence which he was convicted come frequently before the magistrates. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 23 years old, and said to have a good education, was sentenced to two years at hard labor for the identical crime. The judge remarked that no country could remain great while such persons were allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London police courts show that persons accused of the offense of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrates. On the very day he was convicted Kohn Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to have a good education, was sentenced to two years at hard labor for the identical crime.
While Wilde’s case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London police courts show that persons accused of the offense of which he is convicted came frequently before the magistrates. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, twenty-eight years old, and said to have a good education, was sentenced to two years at hard labor for the identical crime.
The Marquis of Queensbery wants the Treasury to reimburse him the L2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde.
The Marquis of Queensberry wants the Treasury to reimburse him the £2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde.
The Marquis of Queensberry wants the Treasury to reimburse him the £2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde.
THE Marquis of Queensberry wants the Treasury to reimburse him the £2,000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde.
The Marquis of Queensberry wants the Treasury to reimburse him the £2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde.
The Marquis of Queensberry wants the Treasury to reimburse him the £2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde.
The Marquis of Queensbury declares that if the Treasury does not reimburse him for the £2000 that he expended in the defence of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde he will ask some member to bring the question before Parliament.
The Marquis of Queensberry declares that if the Treasury does not reimburse him for the £2,000 ($10,000) that he expended in defense of the libel suit which led to the prosecution of Wilde, he will ask some member to bring the question before Parliament.