The Evening Star - Saturday, May 25, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
OSCAR WILDE'S TRIAL.
[Special to Press Association.]
London, May 24.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honorable nature.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honourable nature.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honourable nature.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde, the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honourable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde, the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honourable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the Judge said that he was of opinion that Shelly suffered delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde, the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honourable.
The Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was perfectly honourable.
[…] Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the evidence adduced, which is identical with that of the former trial, remains unshaken. The Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that this friendship was perfectly honourable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the evidence adduced, which is identical with that of the former trial remains unshaken. The Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that this friendship was perfectly honourable.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable. In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable. In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde, the evidence adduced, which was identical with that of the former trial, remains unshaken.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the evidence adduced, which is identical with that of the former trial, remained unshaken.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Oscar Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Oscar Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.