THE OSCAR WILDE SCANDAL.
Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright.

London, April 30.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Oscar Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Oscar Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Oscar Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Oscar Wilde is now in the witness-box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of black mail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanour. Wilde is now in the witness-box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanour. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of a blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanour. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as a victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything and represents himself as a victim of blackmail.

The charges of couspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor were withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor were withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Wilde and Taylor have been withdrawn leaving only those of misdemeanour. Wilde is not in the box. He denies everything and represents himself as a victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Oscar Wilde and Taylor were withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is now in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

The charges of conspiracy against Oscar Wilde and Taylor were withdrawn, leaving only those of misdemeanor. Wilde is not in the witness box. He denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail.

Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Mr Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The judge sums up to-morrow.

Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Mr Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The judge sums up to-morrow.

Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Mr Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The judge sums up tomorrow.

Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Edward Clark, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The Judge sums up tomorrow.

Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The judge sums up to-morrow.

Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was of questionable reputation. The Judge sums up to-morrow.

Taylor swore he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was of questionable reputation. The Judge sums up to-morrow.

London, May 1.—Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him. Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The judge sums up to-day.

Oscar Wilde denies everything, and represents himself as the victim of blackmail. Taylor swore he was absolutely innocent of the charges brought against him. Mr Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The judge sums up to-day.

Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation. The Judge will sump up to-morrow.

Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Sir Edward Clarke, counsel of the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Edward Clarke, counsel for accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal, on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.

Edward Clarke, counsel for accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.