The Brooklyn Citizen - Saturday, April 6, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
HIS BAIL WAS REFUSED.
Wilde Must Stay in Jail During His
Trial.
HE AND TAYLOR ARRAIGNED.
Charged in the Bow Street Police
Court To-Day, with the Abominable
Practices––Charles Parker, Aged 19, Gave
Damaging Testimony
Against the
Aesthete and Dramatist––London
Newspaper Criticism of the Case.
LONDON, April 6.– Oscar Wilde’s friend, Alfred Taylor, was arrested and taken to the Bow Street Police Station this morning.
LONDON, April 6, 1895. - Oscar Wilde's friend, Alfred Taylor, was arrested and taken to the Bow Street Police Station this morning.
LONDON, April 6. - Oscar Wilde's friend Taylor was arrested and taken to the Bow street police station this morning.
London, April 6 — Oscar Wilde’s friend Taylor was arrested and taken to the Bow Street Police Station this morning.
London, April 6. - Oscar Wilde's friend Taylor was arrested and taken to the Bow Street Police Station this morning.
LONDON, April 6 - Oscar Wilde's friend Taylor was arrested and taken to the Bow st police station this morning.
London, Apr. 7. -- Oscar Wilde's friend Taylor was arrested and taken to the Bow street police station yesterday.
Oscar Wilde’s friend, Taylor, was arrested and taken to the Bow street police station this morning.
Latar - Oscar Wilde's friend Taylor was arrested and taken to the Bow st. police station this morning.
LONDON, April 11. -- Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned for examination in the Bow Street Police Court this morning.
LONDON, April 11 - Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned for examination in the Bow st police court this morning.
London, April 11.- Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned for examination in the Bow st. police court this morning.
Oscar Wilde who spent the ningt in a cell, was arraigned before a magistrate this morning, and charged with enticing young men to commit a foul crime, and also with having actually committed the crime himself.
Oscar Wilde was arraigned before a magistrate this morning and charged with enticing young men to commit a foul crime and also with having actually committed the crime himself.
Oscar Wilde was arraigned before a Magistrate this morning and charged with inciting young men to commit a foul crime and also with having actually committed the crime himself.
Oscar Wilde was arraigned before a magistrate this morning, and charged with inciting young men to commit a foul crime, and also with having actually committed the crime himself.
Oscar Wilde was arraigned before a magistrate this morning, charged with inciting young men to commit a foul crime, and also with having actually committed the crime himself.
Wilde was arraigned before a magistrate this morning and charged with inciting young men to commit crime and also with having actually committed immoralities himself.
Wilde was arraigned before a magistrate this morning and charged with inciting young men to commit and also with having actually committed immoralities himself.
Oscar Wilde's friend, Alfred Taylor, was arrested and taken to the Bow street police station this morning. Oscar Wilde was arraigned before a public magistrate this morning and charged with inciting young men to commit a foul crime, and also with having actually committed the crime himself.
London, April 7 — Wilde’s friend, Taylor, was arrested today. Wilde was arraigned this morning charged with inciting young men to commit a foul crime and also having committed the crime himself.
When Wilde was arraigned, Taylor was also placed in the prisoner’s dock, charged with being accessory to Wilde’s crimes. As Taylor stepped into the dock Wilde’s smiliningly recognized him. Taylor is a man of medium size, with sharp features and a fair complexion.
When Wilde was arraigned Taylor was also placed in the prisoners’ dock, charged with being accessory to Wilde’s crimes. As Taylor stepped into the dock Wilde smilingly recognized him. Taylor is a man of medium size, with sharp features and a fair complexion.
When Wilde was arraigned in the Bow street police court this morning Alfred Taylor was also placed in the prisoner’s dock, charged with being an accessory to Wilde's crimes. As Taylor stepped into the dock Wilde smilingly recognized him. Taylor is a man of medium size, with sharp features and a fair complexion.
When Wilde was arraigned in the Bow Street Police Station this morning, Alfred Taylor was also placed in the prisoner’s dock, charged with being accessory to Wilde’s crimes. As Taylor stepped into the dock, Wilde smilingly recognized him. Taylor is a man of medium size, with strong features and a fair complexion.
When Wilde was arraigned in the Bow street police court this morning, Alfred Taylor was also placed in the prisoners' dock, charged with being accessory. As Taylor stepped into the dock Wilde smilingly recognized him. Taylor is a man of medium size, with sharp features and a fair complexion.
Charles Parker, 19 years of age, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, and stated that the latter said Wilde was "good for money." Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants and detailed the conversation between them on those occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy Hotel with Wilde, and of meeting Wilde at his chambers in St. James place. He made fre-quent visits to the latter place. Parker described the conduct of himself and Wilde at these meetings, and swore that he had received money and other presents upon almost every occasion.
Chas. Parker, 19 years of age, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, and stated that the latter said Wilde was "good for money." Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants and related the conversation between them on those occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy hotel with Wilde and of meeting Wilde at his chambers in St. James Place. He made frequent visits to the latter place. Parker described the conduct of himself and Wilde at these meetings, and swore that he had received money and other presents upon almost every occasion.
Charles Parker, nineteen years of age, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, and stated that tbe latter said Wilde was "good for money." Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants, and detailed the conversations between them on those occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy Hotel with Wilde and of meeting Wilde at his chambers in St. James' place. He made frequent visits to the latter place. Parker swore that he had received money and other presents upon almost every occasion.
Charles Parker, 19 years of age, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde and Taylor and stated that the latter said Wilde was « good for money ». Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants, and detailed the conversation between them on those occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy hotel with Wilde and of meeting Wilde at his chambers in St. James Palace. He made frequent visits to the latter place. Parker described the conduct of himself and Wilde at these meetings and was aware that he had received money and other presents upon almost every occasion. The story told by Parker, if true, proves the case of the Treasury against Wilde.
Charles Parker, 19 years of age, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, and said the letter said Wilde was "good for money." Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants, and detailed the conversation between them on those occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy Hotel with Wilde and is meeting Wilde at his chambers in St. James's place. He made frequent visits to the latter place. Parker described the conduct of himself and Wilde at these meetings and swore that he had received money and other presents upon almost every occasion. The story told by Parker, if true, proves the case for the Treasury against Wilde.
Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants, and detailed the conversation between them on those occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy Hotel with Wilde and of meeting Wilde at his chambers in St. James place. He made frequent visits to the latter place. Parker described the conduct of himself and Wilde at these meetings, and swore that he had received money and other presents upon almost every occasion.
Charles Parker, 19 years of age, was the first witness examined. He gave in detail the particulars of his introduction to Wilde by Taylor, and stated that the latter said Wilde was "Good for money." Parker testified that he had frequently dined with Wilde at various restaurants, and detailed the conversations between them on these occasions. He also told of visits to the Savoy Hotel with Wilde, and of meeting Wilde at his chambers at St. James’ Place.
The story told by Parker, if true, proves the case of the Treasury against Wilde.
The story told by Parker, if true, proves the case of the treasury against Wilde.
The story told by Parker, if true, proves the case of the treasury against Wilde.
The story told by Parker, if true, proves the case of the treasury against Wilde.
Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved their right to cross-examine Parker.
Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved their right to cross-examine Parker.
Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved their right to cross-examine Parker.
Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved their right to cross-examine Parker.
Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved their right to cross examine Parker.
Counsel for Wilde and Taylor reserved the right to cross-examine Parker.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were remanded in custody. A request was made that the prisoners be adinitted to ball, but bail was refused.
Wilde and Taylor were demanded in Court today. A request was made that the prisoners be admitted to bail, but bail was refused.
The "Westminster Gazette" commenting on the result of Wilde’s prosecution of the Marquis of Queensberry, says:
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the result of Wilde's prosecution of the Marquis of Queensberry, says:
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the results of Wilde's prosecution of the marquis of Queensberry, says:
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the results of Wilde's prosecution of the marquis of Queensberry, says:
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."
"The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption.
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the Wilde case, says: It proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde's art rests on the basis of rottenness and corruption.
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the Wilde case says: The case proves that it is untrue to say art has nothing to do with morality. Wilde art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption.
The Westminster Gazette, commenting on the Wilde case, says: "The case proves that it is unsafe to say that art has nothing to do with immorality. Wilde’s art rests on a basis of rottenness and corruption."