The Brooklyn Daily Eagle - Saturday, May 25, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
OSCAR WILDE FOUND GUILTY.
Sentenced to Two Years’ Imprisonment
at Hard Labor.
London, May 25– The WIlde case was continued to-day. During the address of Justice Wills to the jury, the foreman asked whether, in view of the intimacy between Lord Alfred Douglas and Alfred Wood, one of the men whose name has been brought prominently into the case, a warrant for Lord Alfred’s arrest had ever been issued. The judge replied that he thought not.
During the address of Justice Wills to the jury the foreman asked whether, in view of the intimacy between Lord Alfred Douglass and Alfred Wood, one of the men whose name has been brought prominently into the case, a warrant for Lord Alfred's arrest had ever been issued. The Judge replied that he thought not.
During the address of Justice Wills to the jury, the foreman asked whether, in view of the intimacy between Lord Alfred Douglas and Alfred Wood, one of the men whose names have been brought prominently into the case, a warrant for Lord Alfred's arrest had ever been issued. The Judge replied that he thought not.
During the address of Justice Wills to the jury the foreman of the jury asked whether, in view of the intimacy between Lord Alfred Douglas and Alfred Wood, one of the men whose names has been brought prominently into the case, a warrant for Lord Alfred's arrest had ever been issued. The Judge replied that he thought not.
During the address of Justice Wills to the jury the foreman asked whether, in view of the intimacy between Lord Alfred Douglas and Alfred Wood, one of the men whose name has been brought prominently into the case, a warrant for Lord Alfred's arrest had ever been issued. The judge replied that he thought not. The foreman then asked if it had ever been thought of.
Justice Wills began summing up at 1:30 P.M. The general tenor of his address was favorable to Wilde. During the delivery of the address the foreman asked whether, in view of the intimacy between Lord Alfred Douglas and Alfred Wood, one of the men whose names had been brought prominently into the case, a warrant for Lord Alfred’s arrest had ever been issued.
The foreman then asked if it had ever been contemplated to issue a warrant for the arrest of Lord Alfred Douglas. To this the judge replied that he could not say, and the court adjourned for lunch.
The foreman then asked if it had ever been contemplated to issue a warrant for the arrest of Lord Alfred Douglas. To this the Judge replied that he could not say, and the court adjourned for lunch.
The foreman then asked if it had ever been contemplated to issue a warrant for the arrest of Lord Alfred Douglas. To this the Judge replied that he could not say, and the court adjourned for lunch.
When the court reassembled for business the judge said the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared, if guilty, simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas, was a wild idea and a matter which they could not discuss. Th present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty or not.
When the court reassembled for business, the Judge said that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared, if guilty, simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas, was a wild idea and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practices with certain persons.
When the court reassembled for business, the Judge said that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared, if guilty, simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas, was a wild idea, and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practices with certain persons.
When the court reassmbled for business the judge said that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared if guilty simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas was a wilde idea and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practices with certain persons.
When court assembled for business the Judge said that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared if guilty simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas was a wild idea and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practices with certain persons.
When Court reassembled for business the Judge said that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas woudl be spared if guilty, simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas, was a wild idea, and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as the whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practice with certain persons.
To this the judge replied that he could not say. He added that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared if guilty simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas, was a wild idea and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practices with certain other men.
The foreman then asked if it had ever been thought of. To this the Judge replied he could not say. He added that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglass would be spared if guilty simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglass was a wild idea and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty.
The Judge replied that he thought not. The forman than asked if it had ever been thought of. To this the Judge replied that he could not say. He added that the suspicion that Lord Alfred Douglas would be spared, if guilty, simply because he was Lord Alfred Douglas, was a wild idea and a matter which they could not discuss. The present inquiry was as to whether the man in the dock was guilty of immoral practices with certain men.
Justice Wills began summing up at 1:30 P. M. THe general tenor of his address to the jury was favorable to Wilde.
Justice Wills began summing up at 1.30 P. M. The general tenor of his address to the jury was favorable to Wilde.
Justice Willis began summing up at 1:30 p. m. The general tenor of his address to the jury was favorable to Wilde.
Justice Wills began summing up at 1.30 p.m. The general tenor of his address to the jury was favorable to Wilde. The jury retired at 3.30 p.m.
Justice Wills began summing up at 1:30 o'clock p.m. The general tenor of his address to the jury was favorable to Wilde. The jury retired at 3:30 o'clock p.m.
The jury retired at 3:30 P. M. and returned to the court room at 5:30. A verdict of guilty was announced.
Sentence was then imposed on Wilde, two years’ imprisonment at hard labor being the penalty inflicted upon him.
Alfred Taylor, Wilde’s associate, was also sentenced to-day to two years’ imprisonment.
Alfred Taylor, Wilde's associate, was also sentenced to two years' imprisonment at hard labor.