The Sun - Friday, May 24, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
OSCAR WILDE'S TRIAL.
The Prosecution Closes, and Sir Edward
Clarke Speaks for Wilde.
LONDON, May 23. - The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Parker’s servants and several servants of the Savoy Hotel were called to the stand and repeated their former testimony. Nothing new was elicited.
LONDON, May 23.– The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Parker’s servants and several servants of the Savoy Hotel were called to the stand and repeated their former testimony. Nothing new was elicited.
LONDON, May 23 - The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning. Parker's servants and several servants of the Savoy hotel were called to the stand, and repeated their former testimony. Nothing new was elicited.
London, May 23.- The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning. Parker's servants and several servants of the Savoy hotel were called to the stand, and repeated their former testimony. Nothing new was elicited.
LONDON, May 23, 1895. The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Parker's servants and several servants of the Savoy Hotel were called to the stand and repeated their former testimony. Nothing new was elicited.
LONDON, May 23 - The trial of Wilde was resumed this morning. Parker's servants and several servants of the Savoy hotel were called to the stand, and repeated their former testimony. Nothing new was elicited.
The case for the prosecution was closed, and Sir Edward Clarke, on behalf of Wilde, argued that part of the indictment charging Wilde with misconduct with unknown persons was not sustained by corroborative evidence.
The case for the prosecution was closed, and Sir Edward Clarke, on behalf of Wilde, argued that part of the indictment charging Wilde with misconduct with unknown persons, was not sustained by corroborative evidence.
The case for the prosecution was closed and Sir Edward Clarke, on behalf of Wilde, argued that that part of the indictment charging Wilde with misconduct with unknown persons was not sustained by corroborative evidence.
The case for the prosecution was closed and Sir Edward Clarke, on behalf of Wilde, argued that that part of the indictment charging Wilde with misconduct with unknown persons was not sustained by corroborative evidence.
The Judge dismissed that part of the case which implicated Wilde in certain practices with Shelley, remarking that he believed Shelley to be mentally deranged.
The judge dismissed that part of the case which implicated Wilde in certain practices with Shelley, remarking that he believed Shelley to be mentally deranged.
The Judge dismissed that part of the case which implicated Wilde in certain practices with Shelley, remarking that he believed Shelley to be mentally deranged.
The court then adjourned, Wilde being again released over night on his old bail.
The Court then adjourned, Wilde being again released overnight on his own bail.
The court then adjourned. Wilde being released over night on his old bail.
The court then adjourned, and Wilde was again released over night on his old ball.
The court then adjourned, Wilde being released over night on bail.
- The San Francisco Examiner - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 99.0%
Compare - The Brooklyn Citizen - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 98.4%
Compare - New York Herald - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 98.1%
Compare - The Gazette - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 97.2%
Compare - The Toronto World - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 82.2%
Compare - Quebec Morning Chronicle - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 73.4%
Compare