The San Francisco Call - Thursday, May 23, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
MARQUIS AND LORD
Queensberry and Son Are Both Bound Over.
THE STREET ENCOUNTER.
Self-Defense Is the
Excuse of the Enraged Father.
DOUGLAS OFTEN INSULTED.
Peculiar Letters Received by His Wife and Other Members of His Family.
LONDON, ENG., May 22. -- At Marlborough-street Police court to-day the Marquis of Queensberry and son, Lord Douglas of Harwick, were bound over, each in $500 to keep the peace.
At the Marlborough street police court this morning the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Douglas, were bound over each in £500 to keep the peace.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Harwick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Hawlck were fashionably dressed. The marquis wore a rose in his button hole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand, his son had a black eye. The marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas of Hawick had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Hawick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any signs of yesterday's fight. On the other hand, his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Harwick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand, his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
LONDON, May 22. - Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglas of Harwick[sic] were fashionably dressed when they appeared in the police court today. The marvuis[sic] wore a rose in his button hole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand his son had a black eye. The marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
Both the Marquis of Queensberry and Lord Douglass of Hawick were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight. On the other hand his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglass of Hawick had a lawyer present to attend to his interests. The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given.
London, May 22. -- At the Marlborough Street Police Court this morning the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, were bound over each in $500 bail to keep the peace. Both the Marquis and Lord Douglas were fashionably dressed. The Marquis wore a rose in his buttonhole and did not show any sign of yesterday's fight, while his son had a black eye. The Marquis was not defended by counsel, but Lord Douglas had a lawyer present to attend to his interests.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and the son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and the son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct as neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but a very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct, as neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other.
The police evidence regarding the encounter between the father and son in Piccadilly yesterday afternoon was first given. The disturbance was described as having taken place near the corner of Bond street. A few words were exchanged and a brief but very determined conflict followed. The combatants were soon separated by the police, who escorted them to the nearest police station, where they were charged with disorderly conduct, as neither the father nor the son would prefer a charge against the other. In his defense the marquis of Queensberry said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the Marquis of Queensberry said that while walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Harwick, came running at him
and pushed him against a store- window, speaking at the top of his voice.
The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the Marquis of Queensberry said that while walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Harwick, came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense, the Marquis of Queensberry said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas of Hawick, came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the marquis said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son, Lord Douglas, came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
In his defense the Marquis said that while he was walking in Piccadilly his son came running at him and pushed him against a store window, speaking at the top of his voice. The Marquis added that he struck his son in self-defense.
Counsel for Lord Douglas of Harwick said that the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly, not thinking of the Marquis of Queensberry, when the encounter between Lord Douglas and his father took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglas of Harwick received the following telegram:
Counsel for Lord Douglas of Harwick said that the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly, not thinking of the Marquis of Queensberry, when the encounter between Lord Douglas and his father took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglas of Harwick received the following telegram:
Counsel for Lord Douglass of Hawick said that the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly, not thinking of the Marquis of Queensberry, when the encounter between Lord Douglass and his father took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglass of Hawick yesterday received the following telegram:
Counsel for Lord Douglas said the latter and a friend were walking in Piccadilly not thinking of the Marquis when the encounter took place. Counsel added that Lady Douglas of Hawick yesterday received the following telegram:
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn tomorrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn tomorrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn tomorrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty; it will be Wilde's turn to-morrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy’s appearance. He looks like a dug up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty. Wilde’s turn tomorrow.
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dried up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty. Wilde's turn to-morrow."
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty; Wilde's turn to-morrow. QUEENSBERRY.
"I must congratulate you on the result of the trial. I cannot on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug up corpse. I fear he has had too much madness of kissing Taylor guilty. Wilde's turn to-morrow. "QUEENSBERRY."
A telegram was received by Lady Douglas of Hawick from Queensberry was as follows. It was sent after the street fight:—"I must congratulate you on the result, but I cannot congratulate you on Percy's appearance. He looks like a dug-up corpse. I fear there is too much madness in kissing. Taylor is guilty. It will be Wilde's turn to-morrow."
"Must congratulate on verdict. Cannot on Percy's appearance; looked like a dug-up corpse. Fear too much madness of kissing. Taylor guilty. Wilde's turn tomorrow. -Queensberry.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that although he had promised to stop writing, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed that Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing these obscene and filthy letters to his wife. The Marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that although he had promised to stop writing he had not done so. Yesterday, it was claimed that Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing "these obscene and filthy" letters to his wife. The Marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglass false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that although he had promised to stop writing he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed that Lord Douglass asked the Marquis to cease writing "these obscene and 'filthy' letters to his wife." The Marquis then hit him in the face, and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that, although he had promised to stop writing, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed Lord Douglas asked the marquis to cease writing "these obscene and filthy" letters to his wife. The marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that, although he had promised to stop writing, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing "these obscene and filthy" letters to his wife. The Marquis then bit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
It was also asserted that the Marquis had written to Lady Douglas false charges against her husband and members of the family, and that, although he had promised to stop, he had not done so. Yesterday it was claimed Lord Douglas asked the Marquis to cease writing these obscene and filthy letters to his wife. The Marquis then hit him in the face and the fight between father and son followed.
After further evidence showing that the Marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After further evidence, showing that the Marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over, each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After further evidence showing that the Marquis was the aggressor the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After further evidence showing that the Marquis was the aggressor the case was settled by the Marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
Further evidence showing that the marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the marquis and his son, being bound over each in £500 bail to keep the peace.
After the further evidence showing that the marquis was the aggressor, the case was settled by the marquis and his son being bound over each in £500 to keep the peace.