WILDE HAS NOTHING TO SAY.
Pale and Distressed, He Is Com-
mitted for Trial.
He and His Companion, Taylor, Al-
lowed No Bail.

LONDON, April 19. -- At the Bow Street Police Court to-day Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, were brought up on remand and were formally committed for trial, bail being refused in each case.

LONDON, April 19. - At the Bow Street Police Court to-day Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, were brought up on remand and were formally committed for trial, bail being refused in each case.

LONDON, April 19. - At the Bow-street Police Court to-day Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, were brought up on remand and formally committed for trial, bail being refused.

It was noon before the prisoners were brought into the dock, and it was noticed that Wilde was much more pallid and distressed than he has appeared since he first appeared in court.

He was obliged to be allowed a seat in the dock, and resled there in a limp fashion, paying no attention to the proceedings.

Wilde was much paler and far at ease than heretofore. He was allowed a seat in the dock and rested there in limp fashion paying little or no attention to the proceedings.

After the evidence in the case had been presented a list of the charges of gross indecency against Wilde was read, and he was asked if he wished to say anything in reply. Wilde answered:

After the evidence in the case had been presented a list of the charges against Wilde was read, and he was asked by the Magistrate if he wished to say anything in reply. Wilde answered: "Not at present."

After the evidence in the case had been presented a list of the charges against Wilde was read, and he was asked by the magistrate if he wished to say anything in reply. Wilde answered: "Not at present."

After the evidence in the case had been presented a list of the charges against Wilde was read and he wa asked by the magistrate if he wished to say anything in reply. Wilde answered, "Not at present."

After the evidence in the case had been presented the charges against Wilde were read and he was asked by the magistrate if he wished to say anything in reply. Wilde answered: "Not at present."

"Not at present."

Alfred Tavlor was then charged with attempting to perpetrate a crime, and both prisoners were committed for trial.

Counsel on behalf of Wilde made an application for ball, but the presiding magistrate replied that, in his opinion, the offense was so grave, and he considered the evidence so serious, that bail could not be allowed.

Counsel on behalf of Wilde made an application for bail, but the presiding magistrate replied that he considered the evidence so serious that bail could not be allowed.

Counsel for Wilde made application for bail, but the presiding magistrate replied that the offense was so grave and the evidence so serious bail could not be allowed.

Alfred Taylor was then charged with attempting to perpetrate a crime, and both prisoners were committed for trial. Counsel on behalf of Wilde made an application for bail, but the Presiding Magistrate replied that in his opinion the offense was so grave and he considered the evidence so serious that bail could not be allowed.

Alfred Taylor was then charged with attempting to perpetrate crime and both prisoners were committed for trial. Counsel on behalf of Wilde made an application for bail, but the presiding magistrate replied that in his opinion the offense was so grave and he considered the evidence so strong that bail could not be allowed.

Alfred Taylor was then charged with attempting to perpetrate an abominable crime, and both prisoners were committed for trial. Counsel on behalf of Wilde made an application for bail, but the presiding Magistrate replied that in his opinion the offense was so grave and he considered the evidence so serious that bail could not be allowed.

Alfred Taylor was then charged with attempting to perpetrate an abominable crime, and both prisoners were committed for trial. Counsel on behalf of Wilde made an application for bail, but the presiding magistrate replied that in his opinion the offense was so grave and he considered the evidence so serious that bail could not be allowed.