Compare Documents

In the Court of Queen's Bench to-day, before Justice Sir Alfred Wills and a Grand Jury, the case of Oscar Wilde and the man Taylor, alleged to be his confederate, charged with flagrant criminal immorality, was brought up for retrial.

The Grand Jury accepted the suggestion of the judge, that the accused should be tried separately, and it was decided that Taylor's case should be tried first.

The evidence given by Parker in the first trial as to the conduct of Wilde, in Taylor's room, remains unshaken.

LONDON, 21ST MAY.

The hearing of the charge of criminal immorality against the man Taylor, who is associated with Oscar Wilde, terminated this afternoon.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

The verdict of the jury in the Wilde-Taylor case says that the prisoner Taylor had been proved by the evidence to have been twice guilty of indecency.

On the charges of procuration, the jury disagreed.

The jury stated that they had not been able to agree on the question whether Taylor and Wilde had committed indecency together.

The judge deferred sentence.

The trial of Wilde is proceeding to-day. The case for the Crown comprises charges of criminal indecency with Taylor, Parkes, Woods and Shelley.

The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the court during the trial.

The evidence given against Wilde by the witnesses for the prosecution remains unshaken by cross-examination.

LONDON, 23RD MAY.

The re-trial of the charges against Oscar Wilde is being continued to-day, before Mr. Justice Wills.

The evidence, so far, is identical with that given at the original trial, and the testimony of the witnesses has not been shaken in any essential particular by cross-examination.

Sir Edward Clarke applied that the judge should not send the Savoy Hotel case to the jury.

Mr. Justice Wills said that a sense of duty prevented him withdrawing this count from the consideration of the jury. He, however, determined to dismiss the count of indecency between Wilde and Shelley, on the ground that the evidence lacked support and it had been shown that Shelley suffered from delusions.

His lordship said that there was nothing unnatural in the friendship between Wilde and Shelley, and it had not been proved to be otherwise than perfectly honorable.

LONDON, May 21 - The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning.

Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names.

The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."

The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.

The jury retired at 3.25 p m.

The marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in the court in the forenoon.

Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case.

There were no notable names among them.

After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry the latter’s solicitor, he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason, signing himself "With love."

The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony and counsel began their addresses to the jury.

Taylor was found guilty on several counts in the indictment.

The court deferred sentence.