Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Evening Star - Saturday, May 25, 1895
London, May 24.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honorable nature.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
Marlborough Express - Monday, May 27, 1895
London, May 24.
[…] Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.