Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Toronto World - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
The Toronto World - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Evening Journal - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
The Evening Journal - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
Difference
London, May 21.—The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court. Taylor was called to the stand, and repeated the
statements he had made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms. Taylor asked to be allowed
to write their names. The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
London, May 21.- The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Taylor was called to the stand and
repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to a question in regard to the visitors at his rooms Taylor asked to be
allowed to write their names. The Judge said : "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I don't approve of mystery." Taylor did not write them,
but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among them. He denied that he had gone through a marriage
ceremony with a man named Mason.
Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among
them. He denied that he had gone through a marriage ceremony with a man named Mason. After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry, the latter’s
solicitors he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. The evidence was concluded with Taylor’s testimony,
and counsel began their addresses to the jury.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor, as regards his complicity with the young man Woods, leaving
them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The Judge, in summoning up the evidence directed the judge to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving
them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty. The jury retired at 3:25 and found Taylor guilty on several
accounts in the indictment. The court deferred sentence.
Taylor was found guilty on several counts in the indictment. The Court deferred sentence.