The Evening Journal - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
TAYLOR FOUND GUILTY.
THE CASE AGAINST OSCAR WILDE'S FRIEND PROVEN.
A Quick Trial—The Names of the Visitors
to Taylor’s—The Mock Marriage with the Man Mason Denied—The Judge's Summing up.
London, May 20.- Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court Old Bailey, this morning, for re-trial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas of Hawick and the Rev. Stuart Hedlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health and spirits as well.
LONDON, May 20.– Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas of Hawick and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health and spirits as well.
London, May 20.—Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning, for re-trial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas, of Hawick, and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health, and spirits as well.
London, May 20. - Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas of Hawick and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health, and spirits as well.
LONDON, May 20. - Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas of Haywick and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health, and spirits as well.
LONDON, May 20 1895. Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas of Hawick and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health, and spirits as well.
LONDON, May 20. -- Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglas of Hawick and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smiling. He is much improved in health and spirits.
LONDON, May 20 - Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the central criminal court, Old Bailey, this morning, for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglass of Hawick and the Rev Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly.
LONDON, May 20 - Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the central criminal court, Old Bailey, this morning, for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties, Lord Douglass of Hawick and the Rev Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly.
London, May 20. -- Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor were arraigned in the central criminal court, Old Bailey, this morning for retrial. Wilde was accompanied by his sureties. Lord Douglas of Hawick and the Rev. Stewart Headlam, and entered the dock smilingly. He is obviously very much improved in health and spirits as well. Sir Edward Clarke asked for a separate trial for Wilde, on the ground that the indictment against him differed from that against Taylor.
Sir Edward Clarke asked for a separate trial for Wilde on the ground that the indictment against him differed from that against Taylor.
Sir Edward Clarke asked for a separate trial for Wilde, on the ground that the indictment against him differed from that against Taylor.
Sir Edward Clarke asked for a separate trial for Wilde, on the ground that the indictment against him differed from that against Taylor.
Sir Edward Clarke asked for a separate trial for Wilde, on the ground that the indictment against him differed from that against Taylor.
Sir Edward Clarke asked for a separate trial for Wilde, on the ground that the indictment against him differed from that against Taylor.
The court granted Wilde a separate trial, and the first case, that against Taylor, proceeded.
The court granted Wilde a separate trial, and the first case, that against Taylor, proceeded.
The court granted Wilde a separate trial, and the first case, that against Taylor, proceeded.
The court granted Wilde a separate trial, and the first case, that against Taylor, proceeded.
The court granted Wilde a separate trial and the first case, that against Taylor, proceded.
Charles and William Parker, the brothers who gave evidence at the first trial were again called as witnesses and repeated the testimony they gave before, except that the cross-examination to which they were subjected elicited from them further admissions as to their blackmailing practices.
When the case against Taylor proceeded Charles and William Parker, the brothers who gave evidence at the first trial, were again called as witnesses, and repeated the testimony they gave before, except that the cross-examination to which they were subjected elicited from them further admissions as to their blackmailing practices.
Charles and William Parker, the brothers who gave evidence at the first trial, were again called as witnesses and repeated the testimony they gave before, except that the cross-examination to which they were subjected elicited from them further admissions as to their blackmailing practices. Counsel for Taylor instanced four cases in which the Parker brothers, separately or conjointly with Wood and Allen, had extorted hush money.
The trial of Taylor then proceeded. Charles and William Parker, the brothers who gave evidence at the first trial, were again called as witnesses and repeated the testimony they gave before, except that the cross-examination to which they were subjected elicited from them further admissions as to their blackmailing practices. The counsel for Taylor instanced four cases in which the Parker brothers, separately or conjointly with Wood and Allen, had extorted hush money.
Counsel for Taylor instanced four cases in which the Parker brothers separately or conjointly with Wood and Allen had extorted hush money.
Today's Proceedings.
London, May 21.- The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to a question in regard to the visitors at his rooms Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said : "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I don't approve of mystery." Taylor did not write them, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among them. He denied that he had gone through a marriage ceremony with a man named Mason.
London, May 21. -- The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
LONDON, May 21, 1895. When the trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court in the morning, Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
London, May 21.—The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court. Taylor was called to the stand, and repeated the statements he had made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms. Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry, the latter's solicitor he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason signing himself "with love."
After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry, the latter’s solicitor, he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason, signing himself "with love."
After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry the latter’s solicitor, he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason, signing himself "With love."
The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony and counsel began his address to the jury.
The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony, and counsel began their addresses to the jury.
The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony and counsel began their addresses to the jury.
The Verdict.
The Judge, in summoning up the evidence directed the judge to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty. The jury retired at 3:25 and found Taylor guilty on several accounts in the indictment. The court deferred sentence.
The Judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be guilty. The jury retired at 3:25 PM.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor, as regards his complicity with the young man Woods, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.