Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Clutha Leader - Friday, June 28, 1895
The Clutha Leader - Friday, June 28, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Otago Witness - Thursday, June 27, 1895
The Otago Witness - Thursday, June 27, 1895
Difference
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show that persons accused of
the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrate. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to
have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labour for the crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are
allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
While Oscar Wilde's case has absorbed public attention for weeks, the records of the London Police Court show that persons accused of
the offence of which he is convicted come frequently before the magistrate. On the very day he was convicted John Goodchild, 28 years old, and said to
have a fine education, was sentenced to two years' hard labour for the crime. The Judge remarked that no country can remain great while such persons are
allowed to live free in it. He believed, indeed, that they should not be allowed to live at all.
The Marquis of Queensbery wants the Treasury to reimburse him the L2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the
prosecution of Wilde.
The Marquis of Queensberry wants the Treasury to reimburse him the £2000 that he expended in defence of the libel suit which led to the
prosecution of Wilde.