Most similar paragraph from
New Zealand Herald - Monday, May 27, 1895
Difference
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honorable nature.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde, the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honourable.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Oscar Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.