Most similar paragraph from
The Oamaru Mail - Monday, May 27, 1895
Difference
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a perfectly honorable nature.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the Judge said that he was of opinion that Shelly suffered delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honorable.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.