Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Evening Star - Saturday, May 25, 1895
The Evening Star - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Star - Saturday, May 25, 1895
The Star - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Difference
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the presiding judge said he was of opinion that the prisoner Shelley suffered from delusions, and that
there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said, did not prove otherwise than that their friendship was of a
perfectly honorable nature.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde the evidence adduced, which is identical with that of the former trial, remains unshaken. The Judge said he
was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with the accused. The evidence, too, he said,
did not prove otherwise than that this friendship was perfectly honourable.
The evidence adduced, which was identical with that given at the former trial, remained unshaken.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto the charges made against him.
In his evidence, Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.