New York Herald - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
TAYLOR FOUND GUILTY.
Verdict Against the Man Who Was Oscar Wilde's
Fellow Prisoner.
[BY CABLE TO THE
HERALD.]
LONDON, May 21, 1895. When the trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court in the morning, Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
London, May 21. -- The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
London, May 21.—The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court. Taylor was called to the stand, and repeated the statements he had made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms. Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
LONDON, May 21. - The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. The Marquis of Queensberry was present. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regards to the visitors to his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
LONDON, May 21. - The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey this morning. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to a questions in regard to visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names.
Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements made in his previous trial. Replying to a question in regard to the visitors at his room he asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
London, May 21.- The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to a question in regard to the visitors at his rooms Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said : "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I don't approve of mystery." Taylor did not write them, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among them. He denied that he had gone through a marriage ceremony with a man named Mason.
Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among them.
Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case.
Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among them. He denied that he had gone through a marriage ceremony with a man named Mason.
The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony, and counsel began their addresses to the jury. The Judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The evidence was ended with Taylor's testimony, and counsel began their addresses to the jury. The Judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving them to decide upon three charges on which Taylor is alleged to be guilty. The jury retired at 3:25 P.M. The Marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in court.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor, as regards his complicity with the young man Woods, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The Judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be guilty. The jury retired at 3:25 PM.
When the Jury returned to the court room and had been polled, the foreman stated that they, though disagreeing on one count, found Taylor guilty on two counts, in regard to Charles and William Parker.
Taylor's sentence was deferred until a verdict should be reached in the trial of Wilde, which will begin to-morrow.
Taylor's sentence was deferred until a verdict should be reached in the trial of Wilde, which will begin to-morrow.
Taylor’s sentence was delayed until a verdict shall be reached in the trial of Wilde, which will began to-morrow.