New Zealand Times - Friday, May 24, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
THE LONDON SCANDAL.
By Telegraph.—Press Association.—Copyright.
London, May 22.
Oscar Wilde is being re-tried to-day before a new jury.
Wilde is being tried on the charge of indecency with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelly.
Wilde is being tried on the charge of indecency with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelly.
Wilde is being tried on the charge of indecency with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelly.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelly.
Wilde is being tried on the charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods, and Shelly.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelley.
Wilde's trial is now proceeding; he is being tried on a charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelley.
The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, who quarrelled with his father the Marquis of Queensberry, in Piccadilly.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, who quarrelled with his father the Marquis of Queensberry, in Piccadilly.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawich, who quarrelled with his father, the Marquis of Queensbury, in Piccadilly.
Lord Douglas accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000; and addressing the crowd he said be disowned his son.
Lord Douglas accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000; and addressing the crowd he said be disowned his son.
Lord Douglas accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000; and addressing the crowd he said he disowned his son.
The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10 000 ; and addressing the crowd he said be disowned his son.
May 22.—It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000. Addressing the crowd he said he disowned his son.
It was not Lord Douglas of Hawick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd, said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing he crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
Both the disputants were bound over, in sureties of £500 each, to keep the peace.
Both the disputants were bound over, in sureties of £500 each, to keep the peace.
Both the disputants were bound over, in sureties of £500 each, to keep the peace.
Both the disputants were bound over, in sureties of £500 each, to keep the peace.
Both the marquis and his son were bound in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace for six months.
Both the marquis and his son were bound in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace for six months.
Both the marquis and his son were bound in sureties of $2500 each to keep the peace for six months.
Both the marquis and his son were bound in sureties of $2500 each to keep the peace for six months.
Addressing the crowd, he said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.