The Mount Ida Chronicle - Saturday, May 25, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
LATE TELEGRAMS
(By Electric Telegraph.)
BY OUR SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT.
May 21st.
THE WILDE SCANDAL.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail. Taylor was convicted on two counts in connection with the charges by William Parker. Sentence has been postponed.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail. Taylor was convicted on two counts in connection with the charges by William Parker. Sentence has been postponed.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail. Taylor was convicted on two counts in connection with the charges by William Parker. Sentence has been postponed.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail. Taylor was convicted on two counts, and sentence has been postponed.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son Lord Alfred Douglas, arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas (arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal) continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas (arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal) continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly today the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequeutly admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensbery and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal continue strained, and in Piccadily to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensbury and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal continue strained, and in Piccadilly today the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas, arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Picadilly to day, the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son, Lord Alfred Douglas (arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal) continue strained, and in Picadilly to day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between he Marquis of Queensbury and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Picadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly on Tuesday the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail. Sir Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and a slanderer. The latter eventually knocked his son down. A furious struggle resulted, until the police interfered and separated the pair.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly, to-day, the Marquis knocked down and severely chastised his son, who called his father a liar and a slanderer. Both were arrested, and subsequently admitted to bail.
The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), arising out of the Oscar Wild scandal, continue strained, and in Picadilly the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested ad subsequently admitted to bail. It appears that Lord Alfred Douglas began the quarrel with his father by calling the Marquis a liar and a slanderer. The latter eventually knocked his son down, and a furious struggle resulted until the police interfered and separated them.
The relations between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Alfred Douglas), which have been the subject of scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to-day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail.
LONDON. May 21.The relations existing between the Marquis of Queensberry and his son (Lord Allred Douglas) arising out of the Oscar Wilde scandal, continue strained, and in Piccadilly to* day the Marquis severely chastised his son. Both were arrested and subsequently admitted to bail. Taylor was convicted on two counts, and sentence has been postponed. May 22. Lord Alfred Douglas began the quarrel by calling the Marquis of Queensberry a liar and slanderer. The latter eventually knocked his son down. A furious struggle resulted, until the police interfered and separated the pair.
May 22.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas, of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of L500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of L500 to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Hawick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10 000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas, of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in two sureties of £500 to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas, of Howick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted—"He was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son." Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Howick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000 and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in securities of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000 and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of L500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000, and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of L5000 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing he crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace. Wilde's trial is now proceeding.
It was not Lord Douglas of Hawick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd, said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for ten thousand pounds, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of five hundred each to keep the peace.
It is not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Howich, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending an insulting letter to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for ten thousand pounds, and addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of five hundred each, to keep the peace.
May 22.—It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000. Addressing the crowd he said he disowned his son.
- Wanganui Herald - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 87.4%
Compare - The Thames Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 69.8%
Compare - Hawera & Normanby Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 69.6%
Compare - Fielding Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 69.0%
Compare - The Ashburton Guardian - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 67.3%
Compare - Evening Post - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 64.6%
Compare - The Poverty Bay Herald - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 64.1%
Compare - The Otago Daily Times - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 62.6%
Compare - The Otago Daily Times - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 61.7%
Compare - The Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 60.3%
Compare - The Cromwell Argus - Tuesday, May 28, 1895 - 60.1%
Compare