The Press - Friday, May 24, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
HOME AND FOREIGN.
Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright
THE MARQUIS OF QUEENSBERRY AND HIS SONS.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Hawick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10 000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas, of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in two sureties of £500 to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Howick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000 and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in securities of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas, of Howick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted—"He was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son." Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas, of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of L500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000 and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of L500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry cried out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000, and, addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both defendants were bound over in sureties of L500 to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for L10,000, and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of L5000 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing he crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace. Wilde's trial is now proceeding.
It was not Lord Douglas of Hawick with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd, said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's securities. Lord Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000, and addressing the crowd said that he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of £500 each to keep the peace.
It was not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for ten thousand pounds, and addressing the crowd said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of five hundred each to keep the peace.
It is not Lord Alfred Douglas, but Lord Douglas of Howich, with whom the quarrel occurred. He accused his father of sending an insulting letter to Lady Douglas, because he was one of Wilde's sureties. The Marquis of Queensberry shouted out that he was anxious to renew the fight for ten thousand pounds, and addressing the crowd, said he disowned his son. Both were bound over in sureties of five hundred each, to keep the peace.
May 22.—It was not Lord Alfred Douglas but Lord Douglas of Hawick, with whom the quarrel occurred. The latter accused his father of sending insulting letters to Lady Douglas because he was one of Wilde's sureties. Lord Queensberry shouted out he was anxious to renew the fight for £10,000. Addressing the crowd he said he disowned his son.
WILDE'S CASE.
Oscar WIlde is being re-tried to-day before a fresh jury.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency, in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelly. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of impropriety in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods, and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in conjunction with Taylor, Woods, and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in conjunction with Taylor, Woods, and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in conjunction with Taylor, Woods, and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Oscar Wilde is being re-tried to-day, before a fresh jury on a charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods, and Shelley. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
London, May 23.—Oscar Wilde is being re-tried to-day before a new jury. Wilde is being tried on the charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods, and Shelly. The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the trial.
Wilde is being tried on a charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods and Shelley.
Wilde is being tried on the charge of indecency in connection with Taylor, Parker, Woods, and Shelly.
- Auckland Star - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 88.0%
Compare - The Hawke's Bay Herald - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 67.9%
Compare - The Daily Telegraph - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 67.0%
Compare - New Zealand Herald - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 63.0%
Compare - The Oamaru Mail - Thursday, May 23, 1895 - 60.2%
Compare - North Otago Times - Friday, May 24, 1895 - 60.1%
Compare