The North American - Monday, April 29, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
The witnesses unshaken.
Trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor is resumed.
London, April 27 — The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, was resumed at the Old Bailey Court yesterday [...] The witness was also questioned by counsel with the view of showing that he received £500 from a foreign count whose yacht was lying at Scarborough, but the witness denied having received the money.
Frederick Atkins, described as an operatic singer, gave evidence to knowing Alfred Taylor and others mentioned during the trial. The witness was also questioned by counsel with the view of showing that he received £500 from a foreign count whose yacht was lying at Scarborough, but the witness denied having received the money.
Frederick Atkins, described as an operatic singer, gave evidence to knowing Alfred Taylor and others mentioned during the trial. The witness was also questioned by counsel with the view of showing that he received £500 from a foreign count, whose yacht was lying at Scarborough, but the witness denied having received the money.
Frederick Atkins, described as a variety singer, gave evidence as to knowing Alfred Taylor and others mentioned during the trial. This witness was also questioned by counsel with a view to showing that he received £500 from a foreign count whose yacht was lying at Scarborough, but the witness denied having received the money.
When Edward Shelly, the former employee of Matthews and Lane, was testifying, and was asked to tell the jury what had occurred in Oscar Wilde’s rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made the witness repeat his story. The day was occupied by the examination of the same witnesses who have already been on the stand.
When Edward Shelley, the former employe of the publishers Matthews & Lane, was testifying, and was asked to tell the jury what had occurred in Oscar Wilde's rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition, and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made the witness repeat his story. The day was occupied by the examination of the same witnesses who have been called to the stand, and the testimony was of the same character as already outlined.
When Edward Shelly, the former employee of the publishers, Matthews & Lane, was testifying, and was asked to tell the jury what had occured in Oscar Wilde’s rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition, and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made the witness repeat his story. The day was occupied by the examination of the same witnesses who have already been called to the stand, and the testimony was of the same character is already outlined.
When Edward Shelly, the former employee of the publishers, Matthews & Lane, was testifying, and was asked to tell the jury what had occured in Oscar Wilde’s rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition, and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made the witness repeat his story. The day was occupied by the examination of the same witnesses who have already been called to the stand, and the testimony was of the same character as already outlined.
When Edward Shelby, the former employe of the publishers, Matthews & Lane, was testifying and was asked to tell the jury what had occurred in Oscar Wilde's room the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made him repeat the story. The day was occupied by the examination of the same witnesses who have already been called to the stand, and the testimony was of the same character as already outlined. The trial was continued until Monday.
When Edward Shelly, formerly employed by publishers Matthews & Land, was asked to tell the jury what had occured in Oscar Wilde's rooms, he particularly appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made him repeat the story. Other evidence of the character already outlined was given, and the trial was then adjourned until Monday.
When Edward Shelly, the former employee of the publishers Matthews & Lane, was testifying and was asked to tell the Jury what had occurred in Oscar Wilde's rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition and thus spare him the shame of repeating it.