The World - Saturday, April 27, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
WILDE'S TRIAL RESUMED.
Testimony of Men Who Appeared in
the Queensberry Case.
LONDON, April 27. -- The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, was resumed at the Old Italley Court to-day, with a large attendance.
LONDON, April 27. — The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, was resumed at the Old Bailey Court to-day, with a large attendance.
LONDON, April 29. - The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, was resumed at the Old Bailey to-day. The evidence presented was chiefly a repetition of former testimony.
LONDON, April 29. -- The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, charged with serious misdemeanors, was resumed at the Old Bailey to-day. The evidence presented was chiefly a repetition of former testimony.
The witnesses examined all testified during the trial of the Marquis of Queensberry.
A youth named Alfred Wood was examined, and was then cross-examined by Sir Edward Clarke, Q. C, counsel for Wilde, but his evidence was not shaken.
Frederick Atkins, another youth, described as a variety singer, gave evidence as to knowing Alfred Taylor and others mentioned during the trial.
Frederick Atkins, described as a variety singer, gave evidence as to knowing Alfred Taylor and others mentioned during the trial.
This witness was also questioned with the view of showing that he received £500 from a foreign count, whose yacht was lying at Scarborough, but the witness denied having received the money.
This witness was also questioned by counsel with the view of showing that he received £500 from a foreign Count, whose yacht was lying at Scarborough, but the witness denied having received the money.
After Atkins had repeated his previous testimony concerning his intimacy with Wilde, and how he accompanied him to Parts as his secretary, Sir Edward Clarke severely cross-examined him, endeavoring to show that Atkins was a professional blackmailer, and that he had blackmailed gentlemen at Nice. Paris and various other places Sir Edward asked:
After Atkins had repeated his previous testimony concerning his intimacy with Wilde, and told how he accompanied him to Paris as his secretary, Sir Edward Clarke severely cross-examined him, endeavoring to show that Atkins was a professional blackmailer and that he had blackmailed gentlemen at Nice, Paris and various other places. During the cross-examination Sir Edward Clarke asked:
After Atkins had repeated his previous testimony, concerning his intimacy with Wilde, and told how he accompanied him to Paris as his secretary, Sir Edward Clarke severely cross-examined him, endeavoring to show that Atkins was a professional blackmailer, and that he had blackmailed gentlemen at Nice, Paris and various other places. During the cross-examination, Sir Edward Clarke asked:
After Atkins had repeated his previous testimony concerning his intimacy with Wilde, and told how he accompanied him to Paris as his secretary, Sir Edward Clarke severely cross-examined him, endeavoring to show that Atkins was a professional blackmailer, and that he had blackmailed gentleman at Nice, Paris and various other places. During the cross-examination, Sir Edward Clarke asked:
After Atkins had repeated his previous testimony concerning his intimacy with Wilde, and told how he accompanied him to Paris as his secretary, Sir Edward Clarke endeavored to show that Atkins was a professional blackmailer and that he had blackmailed gentlemen at Nice, Paris, and various other places. During the cross-examination Sir Edward Clarke asked:
"Did you, two years ago, extort a large sum of money from two Americans who wore staying at the Hotel Victoria?"
"Did you, two years ago, extort a large sum of money from two Americans, who were staying at the Hotel Victoria?"
"Did you, two years ago, extort a large sum of money from two Americans who were staying at the Hotel Victoria?"
"Did you, two years ago, extort a large sum of money from two Americans, who were staying at the Hotel Victoria?"
"Did you, two years ago, extort a large sum of money from two Americans who were staying at the Hotel Victoria?"
Atkins, in reply, said he had not blackmailed the two Americans whose names, it should be added, did not transpire.
Atkins, in reply, said he had not blackmailed the two Americans. The names of the Americans alleged to have been blackmailed did not transpire.
Atkins, in reply, said he had not blackmailed the two Americans. The names of the Americans alleged to have been blackmailed did not transpire.
Atkins, in reply said he had not blackmailed the two Americans. The names of the Americans alleged to have been blackmailed did not transpire.
When Edward Shelly, the former employee of the publishers Matthews & Lane, was testifying and was asked to tell the Jury what had occurred in Oscar Wilde's rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition and thus spare him the shame of repeating it.
When Edward Shelly, the former employee of Matthews and Lane, was testifying, and was asked to tell the jury what had occurred in Oscar Wilde’s rooms, the witness pathetically appealed to counsel to read it from his previous deposition and thus spare him the shame of repeating it. Counsel, however, made the witness repeat his story. The day was occupied by the examination of the same witnesses who have already been on the stand.
Counsel, however, made Shelly repeat his story.
The trial was finally adjourned until Monday.