The Standard Union - Friday, May 24, 1895
This report was originally published in English. Machine translations may be available in other languages.
WILDE SICK.
Allowed to Sit While Testifying in
Court To-day.
HE REPEATEDLY DENIES THE
CHARGES
MADE AGAINST HIM -
THE JUDGE ADHERES TO HIS
DECISION EXCLUDING SHELLY'S
TESTIMONY - QUEENSBERRY BE-
LIEVES WILDE WILL BE AC-
QUITED.
London, May 24. - Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day, Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor-General, made application to the Judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelly, which the court eliminated from the case yesterday. The Court refused to grant the application.
LONDON, May 24. - Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day, Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor-General, made application to the judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley, which the Court eliminated from the case yesterday. The Court refused to grant the application.
LONDON, May 24.– Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor General, made application to the Judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley, which the Court eliminated from the case yesterday. The Court refused to grant the application.
LONDON, May 24 - Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the old bailey court, today, Sir Frank Lockwood, solicitor general, made application to the judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley, which the court eliminated from the case yesterday. The court refused to grant the application.
LONDON, May 24. -- Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day, Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor General, made application to the Judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley which the court eliminated from the case yesterday. The court refused to grant the application.
London, May 24.—Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day Sir Frank Lockwood, solicitor general, made application to the judge for the reinstatement in the case of evidence in regard to Shelley which the court eliminated from the case yesterday. The court refused to grant the application.
LONDON, May 24, 1896. Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde, in the Old Bailey Court to-day. Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor General, made application to the Judge for therein statement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley, which the Court eliminates from the case yesterday. The Court refused to grant the application.
Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the old bailey court, today, Sir Frank Lockwood, solicitor general, made application to the judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley, which the court eliminated from the case yesterday. The court refused to grant the application.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defencs. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defence. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defence. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defence. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defense. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that, because of this, the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defense. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that, because of this, the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defense. He complained o f the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Wilde was then called to the stand and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. He was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde was then called to the stand and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. He was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde was then called to the stand and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. He was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde was then called to the stand and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. Wilde was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde was then called to the stand, and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. Wilde was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde’s testimony brought out nothing new. Sir F. Lockwood, throughout his cross-examination, carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary speech. Wilde repeatedly denied that he had been guilty of any misconduct.
Wilde’s testimony brought out nothing new. Sir F. Lockwood throughout his cross-examination carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary speech.
Wilde's testimony brought out nothing new. Sir F. Lockwood, throughout his cross-examination, carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary speech.
Wilde's testimony brought out nothing new. Sir F. Lockwood, throughout his cross-examination, carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary speech.
Wilde's testimony brought out nothing new. Sir F. Lockwood, throughout his cross-examination, carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary Speech.
Wilde's testimony brought out nothing knew. Sir F. Lockwood, throughout his cross-examination, carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary speech.
Sir Francis Lockwood was addressing the jury when the court adjourned.
Sir Francis Lockwood was addressing the jury when the court adjourned.
Sir Francis Lockwood was addressing the jury when the court adjourned.
Sir Francis Lockwood was addressing the jury when the court adjourned.
Sir Francis Lockwood was addressing the jury when the court adjourned.
When the Marquis of Queensberry was asked what he thought would be the verdict in Oscar Wilde's case he said:
When the Marquis of Queensberry was asked what he thought would be the verdict in Oscar Wilde's case, he said:
When the Marquis of Queensberry was asked what he thought would be the verdict in Oscar Wilde's case he said;
When the Marquis of Queensberry was asked what he thought wouold be the verdict in Oscar Wilde's case he said:
When the Marquis of Queensberry was asked what he thought would be the verdict in Oscar Wilde's case, he said: "I am willing to forfeit $1000 to $1 that Wilde is acquitted."
"I am willing to forfeit 1,000 to 1 that Wilde is acquitted. There are many names back of this thing that say so. I have as much chance of dropping dead in the street to-day as Oscar Wilde has of being found guilty."
"I am willing to forfeit 1,000 to 1 that Wilde is acquitted. There are many names back of this thing that say so. I have as much chance of dropping dead in the street to-day as Oscar Wilde has of being found guilt."
"I am willing to forfeit 1,000 to 1 that Wilde is acquitted.There are many names back of this thing that say so. I have as much chance of dropping dead in the street today as Oscar Wide has of being found guilty."
"I am willing to forfeit £1,000 to any one that Wilde is acquitted. There are many names back of this thing that say so. I have as much chance of dropping dead in the street to-day as Oscar Wilde has of being found guilty."
When the marquis was asked what he thought would be the verdict in Oscar Wilde’s case, he said: "I am willing to forfeit 1,000 to 1 that Wilde is acquitted. There are many names back of this thing that say so. I have as much chance of dropping dead in the street today as Oscar Wilde has of being found guilty."
When the Marquis of Queensberry was asked what he thought would be the verdict, he said: "I am willing to bet 1,000 to 1 that Wilde is acquitted. There are many names back of this thing that say so. I have as much chance of dropping dead in the street today as Oscar Wide has of being found guilty."